Keyword: DYNASTY | Once upon a time…

Once upon a time a man decided to conquer all the land he could reach. As people tended to resist domination, he gathered an army and took the land by force, making the people he encountered his subjects. When all the land was under his control, he set rules (1) so governance would follow a straight line. He was powerful, yet still mortal. The time came when he had to think about his successor: the person who would rule after his death. The obvious choice would be his eldest son, who would be his flesh and blood and would be brought up by him, following his beliefs. Therefore, he chose a woman to become his wife and bear children, especially male babies. Women, even if they were smart, could not become a king’s successor as they were bound to give birth to children and take care of the house.

And so, the man became a king and the head of his family. He set an example to his subjects: to start a family, where the “father” would be the master and the “mother” would be the carer. Children would follow their parents’ footsteps and start their own families, following the same rules, and be happy in a harmonious country. As the king’s son would become a king, the blacksmith’s son would become a blacksmith, the baker’s son would become a baker, and so on. Everyone would have a place in society.

The king’s family was the most powerful because it was bound to rule them all. Therefore, his children were raised with such a belief. As each family lived in the same house, the ruling family was known as the House of their last name/ their father’s name. The family business was also recognised by the family’s name/ the head of the family’s last name. There was the House of the blacksmith’s family, the House of the baker’s family, and so on. Except, these families had a very limited power within society. Over time, the king’s family would become a dynasty (2) because they had power. The dynasty would last as long as sons (or other members of the family) would succeed to the head of the family and the head of state, becoming themselves the (new) head of the family and the head of state. Once the family/House changed, the dynasty would change too. The concept later extended to very powerful families that would become powerful through their business (and money earned). The key component to a family becoming a dynasty is having power over a certain period of time, where children succeed their parents in exercising such power. This is especially true in countries where money equals power.

Dynasties have shaped the world. A country’s history is often told according to the powerful families that had ruled it. Each dynasty represents a different period of history, sometimes very different in social and aesthetics terms than the previous one. In order to become a powerful and ruling family, many wars were fought, many assassinations were executed, many plots were devised. At some point, families found out that they could also gain power through marriage. Although they were not initially part of the aristocracy of that time, marrying “wisely” would give them access to it and, later, a noble title would land in the House.

Most powerful dynasties/families/Houses:
Julian clan | Roman Empire
Capetian dynasty | Kingdom of France
House of Habsburg | Europe (a little bit everywhere)
Medici Family | Italian bankers
Genghis Khan’s family | Mongol Empire
Dynasties in China
The Richest Families in America

 
NOTES:

 


This article is part of the WORD CHRONICLES series
Word Chronicles are articles where the meaning of words, concepts, and perceptions are discussed.

 

 

The family, la famille, die Familie, la familia

Family is a classic topic of every language learning syllabus. The members of “The Foreign Land’s Explorers” approached it the usual way initially, but they wanted to go further. So, they made a new table with terms related to family, but which were not learned in regular language classes. They built a table, knowing it was just a reference. Each word should not be taken as exact equivalents to the other languages. Once they had the table, they constructed the same sentences in every language, for example: “the spouses become parents and constitute a household with their offspring”.

[click to enlarge]

“Ah, ‘offspring’ in Italian is ‘prole’”, noted Leo. “Did you know that ‘proletariat’ comes from the Latin word ‘proletarius’, which means someone belonging to the lowest (and poorest) class that would only be considered as ‘citizen’ if they had children? I guess ‘children’ here would mean labour force or soldiers. Therefore, ‘prole’ in Italian comes directly from the Latin word meaning ‘children’”.

“Sometimes people don’t realize how much Latin language has influenced European languages, all of them”, said Elizbeth. “For example, ‘adoption’ is similar in these languages and comes from the Latin word ‘adopto’, which is the combination of ‘ad’ and ‘opto’. ‘Ad’ means ‘to’ and ‘opto’ means ‘choose’. So, basically ‘adoption’ is ‘to choose’”.

“I may be wrong, but it seems that word is the only word here in the table to come from Latin in what German, Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish are concerned”, noted Sophia. “Interesting that ‘offspring’ in Nordic languages is ‘of coming’. Well, in English it has a similar meaning: getting out of where they were made. Like the rivers that leave the place where they were ‘born’ and run until they reach the sea. They ‘come’ from somewhere.”

“Knowing where you come from has always been very important. Look at Royal families. Being part of a Royal family can determine if you will lead the country or not, whether you want it to or not”, said Elizabeth.

“Some Kings have renounced the post, so it’s not inevitable. But, yes, for them, it is something that is always there, since childhood. And they are also pressured to have a ‘prole’, a male heir to the throne and some ‘spare’ male children, just in case something happens to the oldest. It’s not exclusive for poor people, although it is different, of course”, added Michael.

“Poor people provide the labour force in sequence. Rich people build dynasties to rule the poor people. It is the system of castes. Once you are born in one, you have to play your role regardless of your wishes”, said Elizabeth.

“That is not entirely true nowadays”, said Sophia. “Royals can now marry commoners and commoners can aspire to climb the social ladder”.

“Dynasties still have weight in society. Being a son or a daughter of an important family is always a mark, even if that person follows a different path”, said Michael.

“Ok, remember I told you that we use more Latin-based words than we realize? Well, I checked the word ‘dynasty’ and it is actually a Greek word, although it was stolen by the Latin language’”, said Elizabeth.

“Let me see”, said Michael, looking at her computer and starting to read. “It says that a dynasty is ‘a succession of rulers of the same line of descent’ and it gives China as an example. Then, it says it can also be ‘a powerful group or family that maintains its position for a considerable time’. It meets what we were saying, I think”.

“Royal families are a reference. They are a symbol of continuity, tradition, and identity”, said Sophia. “That’s why they are so important for people. People see them as the leaders of the nation. It’s no coincidence that the countries’ history timeline is told through dynasties, especially in China. They say ‘this was done during this Dynasty’. For example, the Great Wall of China was constructed during the Ming Dynasty. You need to know when they ruled to know the respective period of time. In Europe, you talk about epochs, like Ancient Times, Medieval Times, Renaissance.”

“Well, in Europe, history is also made of dynasties, although they are named ‘Houses’, like in ‘The Game of Thrones’”, said Elizabeth and laughed. “For example, the House of Habsburg was one of the most influential families in European history. In the UK, the House of Tudor is one of the most famous Royal families due to King Henry VIII and his six wives. The current UK’s Royal family is the House of Windsor. And, of course, there were prominent families that didn’t belong to any Royal family, like the Medici, who ruled Florence for many years”, said Elizabeth.

“In the USA, they also categorize their history periods according to presidential administrations: the President Obama’s administration, the President Biden’s administration…”, noted Michael. “Actually, the story of the name ‘President’ is curious. When the USA became independent, they had to choose a name for their Head of the State. ‘King’ was suggested, but they didn’t want to give ideas of grandeur to a man who should be feeling humble. So, they decided to give him the name of ‘someone who chaired meetings’. They thought it was humble enough. Not any more”.

“Well, they also have dynasties of some sort there, like the Bushes and the Kennedys…”, said Leo. “Like the Medici, these families became powerful after they had become very rich.”

“In the end, money rules the world. And, sometimes, the families who have it”, concluded Jack.

 


** YOUR WORDS AND IDEAS **

By Isabella Muir | On 30 April 2025 at 12:08
Some very interesting insights into the meanings of ‘family’ – a term that has changed significantly over the centuries. Nuclear families (often blood relatives) contrasts with ‘blended’ families, where a wide range of relationships come together. It would be interesting to explore how ‘family’ contrasts with ‘community’ – both can be supportive networks, but both can be just the opposite!

By Words in Ideas | On 01 May 2025 at 21:19
That would be very interesting, yes. “Blended” families is a good term – maybe in future “blended” will replace “nuclear”?…

 


This article is part of the FOREIGN LANDS series
Foreign Lands aims to discuss the difference between languages and cultural backgrounds. And do a little bit of travelling too.